IT Organization Modeling and
Assessment Tool (ITOMAT)

How can
the performance of your IT
organization be assessed?
Is there a
connection between good IT
organization quality, and good
outcome of IT in terms of
fulfillment of business needs?
The ongoing
ITOMAT study tries to answer
these questions by conducting
case studies within a large
number of organizations, in
Sweden and abroad. If you're
interested in participation,
please contact
Mårten Simonsson,
Ph. D. Student.
The ITOMAT
research project started in 2006
as an attempt to explore the
field of IT governance. It was
soon discovered that a best
practice framework to assess the
quality of an IT organization already exists
- It is called
Control OBjectives for Information and
related Technology (COBIT).
Even though COBIT is widely
accepted, it falls short in
regards to several aspects. See
Table 1 below. The content of
the table is
more thoroughly explained in
Simonsson, 2007.
Table 1. A
comparison of COBIT and ITOMAT
|
Domain
|
Requirement
|
COBIT fulfillment
|
ITOMAT fulfillment
|
|
Validity
|
Consistency with common
conceptions
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
|
Reliability
|
Descriptive
operationalization
|
Partly
|
Yes
|
|
Normative
operationalization
|
No
|
Yes
|
| Cost
|
Support for efficient
data collection
|
No
|
Yes
|
|
Support for efficient
analysis
|
No
|
Yes |
It was
therefore decided to try overcoming the
shortages in COBIT and develop a
new tool to support IT
organization assessment. A modeling approach
was used. The endeavor was
called ITOMAT - IT Organization
Modeling and Assessment Tool. Such
a tool has now been created, and
in the
remainder of 2007 and early
2008, ITOMAT will be used to
assess the quality of several IT
organizations (internal
metrics). In
parallel, information regarding
the organizations' economic performance and
the business' perception of the
quality of the IT delivered
(External metrics) will be
collected. See Figure 1. Given
sufficient empirical data, the
findings will allow us to
foresee the expected quality of
an IT organization by looking at
just a few metrics, i.e. finding
which IT processes that really
affect economic
outcome or percepted
quality of IT services. Further,
we may
suggest changes and
delimitations to the current
COBIT framework, that is far too
extensive to conduct quick
assessments of IT organization
quality.
Figure 1.
Correlation of Internal and
External metrics. Do e.g. IT
processes with high maturity
(surrounded by red ellipses)
correlate with good results for
external metrics? In the study,
we will find out.

Last but not
least, the findings from the
study will result in a Ph. D.
Thesis to be defended by Mårten
Simonsson in spring 2008.
If you have any questions or
concerns regarding ITOMAT, or if
your company is interested in
participation, please don't hesitate to
contact
Mårten Simonsson. Below,
some publications related to ITOMAT
are listed.
Author:
Mårten Simonsson, Pontus
Johnson, Hanna Wijkström
Title:
Model-based IT Governance
maturity assessments with Cobit
In:
European Conference on
Information Systems
Date:
June 2007
Author:
Mårten Simonsson, Pontus Johnson
Title:
Assessment of IT Governance - A
Prioritization of Cobit
In:
Proceedings of the Conference on
Systems Engineering Research
Date:
April 2006
Author:
Mårten Simonsson, Mathias
Ekstedt
Title:
Getting the Priorities Right -
Literature vs Practice on IT
Governance
In:
Proceedings of Portland
International Center for
Management of Engineering
Technology
Date:
July 2006
|